esamskriti
"A platform to share knowledge and insights to help Indians reconnect
with their heritage and build a glorious future together"

Current Affairs

Watch Out For The Taliban Of Untouchability
By Rakesh Krishnan Simha, April 22 2010 [[email protected]]

Chapter :

The petty blacklisting  of actor Amitabh Bachchan for being the brand ambassador of Gujarat exposes  India’s pseudo secularists for what they really are – a bunch of intolerant  demagogues.

It’s a full-time job staying abreast of the  colourful epithets that come spinning out of India’s political landscape. The  latest one, “Taliban of untouchability”, coined by Gujarat Chief Minister  Narendra Modi, is interesting in its sweep.

The term is the perfect label for India’s pseudo  secularists who are trying to brand Modi –plus anyone and everyone associated  with him – into a political untouchable for his alleged failure to prevent the  retaliatory killings of Muslims in 2002 following the murder of 57 Hindu  pilgrims in Godhra, Gujarat.

This gaggle of pseudo secularists comprises  sundry communists, Congress leaders, fringe academics, Muslim activists and  sections of the media. The pressure exerted by this group has been so successful  that Modi has become a four letter word for some of India’s liberals.

And in tandem with Christian fundamentalist  senators in the United States, this group has even managed to influence  Washington to ban the democratically elected Indian leader from entering  America. (It’s another matter that America really has no locus standi here, as  it is an entirely domestic Indian issue.)

The latest salvo by the anti-Modi nexus has been  fired at veteran actor Amitabh Bachchan, whose only ‘fault’ was endorsing Gujarat  tourism. The Congress, in a 21 century reprise of McCarthyism, has gone after  the 67 year old actor, demanding that Bachchan clarify what he thinks of Modi’s  role in the 2002 riots.

Even by the low standards of political discourse  in India, the Congress’ malice pushes the boundaries of generally accepted  conduct. By their rulebook, anyone and anything associated with Modi is  considered polluted. As the indefatigable BJP leader said, “Next they’ll ban  Amul butter and denim because they are both made in Gujarat.”

That remark was not far off the mark. The  Congress shouting brigade objected to Bachchan’s presence at a government  function in Mumbai, and party workers ripped off posters of his actor son  Abhishek. The controversy is likely to erupt again on May 1 when Gujarat  observes its golden jubilee. Bachchan will be taking part in the lavish  celebrations that the state government has planned, and the Congress has warned  the star's presence in the celebrations will again bring him in the line of  fire.

Shrill sloganeering was a hallmark of Congress politics even  during M.K. Gandhi’s days, but now it is totally replacing informed debate. The  party apparently is so frustrated at Modi’s popularity in Gujarat that it is  willing to blacklist the entire state. In the eyes of India’s pseudo  secularists, India’s most prosperous and peaceful state is a rogue. In fact,  the Congress has declared it will be boycotting the jubilee celebrations.

Lost in this haze of McCarthyism and outright  lies is the real picture. Take the number of those killed in the riots.  Initially, the pseudo secularists claimed 2,000 Muslims were killed. Of late  the figure has been inflated to 3,000. Who knows, 20 years from now it could  snowball to a fantastic number!

But facts tell a different story:
  * In its issue dated 20 May 2002, India Today  weekly reported the Gujarat toll at 972. In this, India Today included the 57  Hindus killed in Godhra.
  * In May 2002, Nagpur’s The Hitavada reported  936 people killed – nearly identical to India Today’s tally if you remove the  Godhra figure.
  * In a news item dated 11 May 2005, the Indian  Express quoted Congress leader and Minister of State for Home Sriprakash  Jaiswal’s statement before Parliament that 790 Muslims and 254 Hindus were  killed in the riots.

How many times have you read that Hindus too  were killed in the Gujarat riots? Has there been one – just one – story, among  the thousands, about some NGO setting up a camp for the families of the 254  Hindus killed? At least I haven’t.

And that’s the crux of the matter. India’s  secularists will be out of a job if they reveal that Hindus were killed as  well. For them, the riots were a pogrom, no less. For that reason they keep  talking about Muslim deaths alone.

To be sure, the killing of Muslims is to be condemned.  Muslims are equal citizens of India – no more, no less. However, because of the  pseudo secularists’ communal tilt, the killing of Hindu pilgrims in Godhra is  being airbrushed out of the picture. If at all Godhra is mentioned, the  purveyors of lies coldly dismiss it as a Muslim backlash against Hindutva. The  same yardstick is not applied to the Gujarat riots. Hindu fundamentalism,  rather than Hindu anger at Godhra, is to be blamed as per the handbook of our  warped secularists.

The same bunch applauding the Special  Investigation Team (SIT) for its marathon 10-hour grilling of Modi is ignoring  the fact that the agency had in 2009 censured foaming-at-the-mouth activist  Teesta Setalvad and her NGO, Citizens for Justice and Peace.

The SIT report says on page 10 that three  alleged witnesses “had brought with them ready-made statements prepared on  computer and requested the IO (investing officer) to take them on record. The  IO explained to them that according to law they had to be questioned and examined  and their statements reduced in writing by the IO’’.

It goes on to say, ‘‘On questioning them in  respect of the typed statements, all 3 of them stated that the computerised  prepared statements were given to them by Smt Teesta Setalvad and advocate  Tirmiji and that they had merely signed and initialled on such prepared  statements.’’

And in a damming indictment of Teesta, the  report continues, “There are discrepancies between the prepared statements and  statements recorded by the IO. In respect of 6 witnesses, there are  contradictory statements relating to the names of the accused they were linking  with (the) crime.”

In a report dated April 14, 2009, The Times of  India reported: “Many incidents of killings and violence were cooked up, false  charges were levelled against then police chief P.C. Pandey and false witnesses  were tutored to give evidence about imaginary incidents, the SIT said. It also  found no truth in the following incidents widely publicised by the NGOs:
  * A pregnant Muslim woman Kausar Banu was  gangraped by a mob, who then gouged out the foetus with sharp weapons. The  media has not bothered to question Setalvad for this horrendous lie.
  * Dumping of dead bodies into a well by rioters  at Naroda Patiya.
  * Police botching up investigations into the  killing of British nationals.”

The 2009 movie Firaaq added more fuel to the  Guajrat fire. The film, co-written by New Zealand-based Shuchi Kothari and  B-grade actor Nandita Das, portrayed Hindus as evil caricatures who enjoy  raping Muslim women and then talking about it at leisure. The violence suffered  by the Hindus has been completed ignored. Das, when asked why she did not show  the other side, replied with callous indifference: “There is no other side.”  Predictably, Firaaq won a slew of awards worldwide and also in Pakistan, where  it won best picture. But then what do you expect of people who for the sake of  adulation in Pakistan and the West, show India as a land of people who just  came down from the trees?

The Goebbelsian propaganda has worked. Many  middle class Hindus were overcome with revulsion after hearing stories of the  riots, especially the fictitious one about the pregnant woman. The liberal  elite continue to associate Modi and the Hindu parties with genocide and  murderous acts they never committed. Women voters, especially, have pulled away  from the right.

Such utter disregard for the truth is having  extremely dangerous consequences. Several terrorists apprehended by the police  have revealed they were motivated to create terror cells and blow up innocent  people after reading about the so-called pogroms.

May 1 will reveal how far the Congress will go  in baiting Modi. For all you know, the Congress coterie might well slap a ban  on Amul butter. After all, in 1975 the same party got Kishore Kumar songs  unofficially banned from All India Radio because the singer refused to perform  at a Youth Congress rally.

Isn’t it bizarre that we are living in an age  when India’s greatest actor is treated like an untouchable for becoming the  Brand Ambassador of an Indian state, while another actor Shahrukh Khan is feted  for saying “Pakistan is a wonderful neighbour to have”?

(About the author: Rakesh Krishnan Simha is a  features writer at Fairfax New Zealand. He has previously worked with  Businessworld, India Today and Hindustan Times, and was news editor with the  Financial Express.)

Also read:
1. Maximum terror attacks during Congress rule says  noted security expert B Raman
2. Did Godhra Save Pakistan by Col Anil Athale
3. Godhra: The True Story by Nicole Elfi
4. Do foreign contributions to India impact  national security FCRA Report 2007-08 by Sanjeev Nayyar

Chapter :

Post A Comment

'The purpose of this feature is to provide a platform for exchange of views.
Please Register with site to post a comment and avoid abuse and getting into personal arguments.


Add Your Comment