Sufis
Sufism has always been undeservedly extolled and glorified by naive Hindus, even
Hindu intellectuals, who have not cared to critically analyse its real role in this
country. Some scholars including our incumbent President have gone to the extent
of claiming that Sankara’s (born 502 BC) advaita has been deeply influenced
from his contacts with Sufis! The name ‘Sufi’ referred to Muslim ascetics who clothed
themselves in coarse garments of wool (suf). There have been mystics in every
region and religion and those in the Arab world in pre-Islamic days were in all
probability influenced by Hindu mysticism, and Buddhism (it should be remembered
that Central Asia was wholly Buddhist then). With the advent of Islam with its rigid
exoteric and fanatic tenets, the movement must have initially functioned underground.
Later on compromises with Islam would have been made and mysticism brought under
the Islamic fold. But these compromises killed the essential spirit of mysticism.
The orthodox ulema never reconciled with the free spirit of enquiry but at
the same time could not control the mystic and spiritual yearning in individuals,
whenever it happened to find intense public expression. Thus, there has always been
an uneasy resignation of the mind and intellect with regard to the severe persecution
of Sufis under fanatic rulers, particularly Shias. The Sufis adopted Islamic terms
described later in their spirituality and it is a pity that this movement, originating
from our spirituality, has been misused later to convert our own people to a fanatic
creed.
The adjustment was done very subtly. Advantage was taken of the fact that it is very
difficult to be convicted of heresy in Islam where judgment on a man’s interior
motive is reserved to God and man’s judgment is based largely on a person’s action.
An individual was condemned only when he introduced innovations in religious law
or repudiated it. Consequently, the Sufi leaders stressed that their religious practice
was fully in line with sharia and their writings are choked with hadiths
justifying it! In order to make themselves more respectable, the authority of the
Sufi masters was traced right back to one of the first four ‘rightly-guided’ caliphs
to different aspects of the Sufi path! But due to these compromises, Sufism could
never spontaneously flower and gain depth, and most Sufi organizations only helped
their rulers in extending the scope of Islam. The true Sufis have mostly functioned
in seclusion.
The Three Stages of Growth of Sufism in India
Trimingham has studied the social order of Sufis extensively and classified their
evolution in three stages. The first is khanaqah (rest-house or dharmashala),
or the initial stage. During the reign of the Abbasids in the eighth century, individuals
tired of opulence of the rulers and the dogma of the ulema, dropped out of
society and became wandering monks. This was truly the golden age of Sufism with
emphasis more on love of God and spiritual affinity with God than on fear of God.
There was a loose master-disciple bond, but no structured organisation as such.
Two important schools arose, the Junaidi - named after Abul-Qasim al-Junaid (d.
910 AD) and Bistami - named after Abu Yazid al-Bistami (d. 874 AD). The Junaidi
School was the more orthodox, largely conforming to the Islamic dogma, sober and
moderate and thus more acceptable to the orthodox and he came to be regarded as
‘the Shaikh of the Way’. The Bistami School on the other hand was characterised
by ecstasy, rapture and intoxication and hence discouraged.
From about the thirteenth century, the second phase, tariqa, meaning ‘the
path’ or ‘method’, was started with the establishment of mystical schools that began
to coalesce around one or another master. Mystical techniques gradually crystallized
into structured schools of thought, in which the method, consisting of a structured
set of spiritual exercises, had to be learnt and mastered. During this phase the
principle of the transmission of the method from one Sufi to another became explicit,
resulting in the formation of spiritual lineages or silsilas (chain) that
corresponded to each school and which could be traced back to the founder of each
school. A guru-sishya relationship was now formally formed with greater systematisation,
differentiation and specialization among the various schools. Manuals of rituals
were now produced as guides for the director and his students. The power of the
Word of God in Koran was stressed and orthodox rituals were invested with esoteric
significance. The founders, many of them professional jurists, clung to the externals
of Islamic practice and based their invocations solidly on the Koran. This won them
the seal of approval from the ulema and also enriched the devotional life
of the ordinary Muslim.
The thirteenth century was also an age of extreme disturbance and change as the
non-Muslim Mongol hordes swept across central Asian Muslim states. Hence wave after
wave of Muslim refugees including Sufis fled to those parts of the Muslim world
which were relatively remote from this danger. Among these were Anatolia in the
north-west and Bharat in the south-west. Many Sufis found a new home within the
jurisdiction of the Turkish sultanate of Delhi. Sufis in India, during this period
were influenced by the vibrant Hindu ethos of the country and through them; Islam
acquired the dimension of a holy-man religion.
The Sufis and the gentle, seemingly mystical Islam acquired an aura of holiness
around them which attracted gullible Hindus to them. There were two categories of
Sufis in the country, those associated with khanaqahs and the wanderers.
The former, were in a special sense, the focal points of Islam - centers of holiness,
fervor, ascetic exercises and Sufi training. Contrary to the corresponding Arab
institutions, the Indian khanaqahs grew up around a holy man and became associated
with his tariqa or method of discipline and exercises. Two main tariqas
were formed - that of Muinaddin Chishti (d. 1236 AD) and his follower, Qutb ad-din
Bakhtiyar Kaki, of Ajmer and of Suhrawardi. They acquired such fame that they began
to matter in the political and religious calculations of the ruling authorities
and under them; khanaqahs sprang up everywhere, the majority without definite
ascriptions. Wandering dervishes for whom they formed centers for training, meeting
and hospitality were numerous and acted as cultural agents in spreading and stabilising
Islam in India during this period.
Another significant development took place in the history of Sufism because of the
Mongol invasion between the period AD 1219-95. Muslim Asia was subjected to the
domination of non-Muslim rulers and Islam was displaced from its position as state
religion. During this period the Sufis became, for the people, the representatives
of the religion and were also responsible for the eventual conversion of Mongols
to Islam. We should perhaps ask ourselves why the Hindu religion never attempted
to accomplish the Hinduisation of successive Muslim and Christian invaders! Even
after their death, the shrines in honour of the Sufi saints, and not the mosques,
became the symbol of Islam for Iranians, Tartars and Turks. Thus Timur was nominally
a Sunni but offered high respect and veneration for saints and their shrines, many
of which he built or restored. His descendant, Babar, introduced the Naqshabandi
order in India Thus, with this kind of State support and patronage Sufis gained
a grudging respectability from the ulema in the world of Islam.
The third phase, taifa or cult-association, began from the fifteenth century.
Direct communion with God was replaced by the veneration and even worship of a pir
or Master who now occupied the position of a spiritual intermediary between the
disciple and God. They also became hereditary, particularly in India, as blood replaced
merit as the chief criterion of succession. Barakat, the intangible capacity
of a saint to wield spiritual power and to attract devotees, was transmitted not
only to a saint’s descendants (pir-Zadas), but also to his tomb. These tombs,
in India called dargahs, generally replaced khanaqahs as the physical
structure upon which the Sufi movements were based. Sufism now became more
a devotional than a mystical movement and hence very popular among all sections
of the people including impressionable Hindus, for attaining worldly desires. This
phase witnessed the introduction of astrology, magic, belief in talismans and charms
and other superstitions as means of preserving the flow of barakat from the
saint. As Trimingham sums it up, if Sufis in the khanaqah phase surrendered
to God, and in the tariqa phase to a method of discipline, in the taifa
stage they surrendered to a person, the barakat possessing saint of whose
cult they were members. But this development contributed to the decline of Sufism
as a mystical path to god-realization. Spiritual insight atrophied and the Way became
paved and marked. Except perhaps in Iran, Sufi writings ceased to show any real
originality.
None of the orders in India could escape being influenced by their religious environment.
Many branches became highly syncretistic, adopting various pantheistic thought and
antinomian tendencies. Many practices were taken over from the Yogis- extreme ascetic
disciplines, celibacy and vegetarianism. Wanderers of the qalandari type
grew in numbers. Local customs were adopted; for example, in the thirteenth century
the Chishtis paid respect to their leaders by prostrating themselves before them
with their foreheads touching the ground. The Indian Qadiri shaikhs now extend very
far the process of compromise with Hindu thought and custom.
The nineteenth century saw two major developments in the Sufi orders. The first
was caused by the rise of the fundamentalist Wahabi movement which stressed a return
to the simplicity of a mythical unadulterated Islam. They rejected any sort of intermediaries
between man and God and as a result they destroyed the tombs of several Sufi saints
in their regions of influence. Also extreme decadence had set in the Sufi orders
and some of the reformers now stressed that the purpose of their spiritual practices
was union with the spirit of the Prophet, rather than union with God. This
change has been termed by some as Neo-Sufism and has affected the basis of their
mystical life.
The Effect of Sufism on Hindus And Hinduism
Vedaprakash has analysed the role played for Islam by the Sufis. As stated above,
the Sufis in India found great acceptability among the Hindus and they were respected
for their deportment, dress, and use of Hindu terminology and for the manner in
which they generally conducted themselves. They even adapted and adopted Hindu methods
to make their cult attractive. It was propagated that the Atharva Veda was faithfully
practiced by them. Their ‘Rishi Movement’ was an integral component of the process
of Islamisation that started in the Kashmir valley in the wake of the introduction
of the Sufi orders from Central Asia and Iran in the fourteenth century. In general
they used their spiritual clout for converting Hindus without immediately changing
their culture, i.e. externally they would be Hindus, but internally they were Muslims
(crypto-Muslims) following all Hindu practices. This can be illustrated by the Bengali
Muslims’ love for their language and culture, the Benaras Sunni community’s belief
in various Hindu practices, Hindu laws of inheritance applicable to Khojas, and
Puthi literature. The latter in fact contained many allegorical puranas and terminology.
In one such book, Muhammad is considered as one of the Avataras, and Ali is worshipped
as the tenth avatar in the Dasaavatara of Vishnu and the Imams are held to be his
incarnation in turn. Even the conversion ceremonies were accompanied by Hindu practices
and symbols like distribution of vibhuti and flowers and substitution of Ganga water
for the Meccan Zam Zam water. The following terms common to Sufis all over the world
and most probably borrowed by Sufis originally from Hindus, were used stressing
their similarity to Hindu concepts.
Fikr
|
Dhyan
|
Zikr
|
Smarana or Japa
|
Voral Zikr
|
Bhajan
|
Wird
|
Manana
|
Shuhud
|
Final stage of dhyana
|
Tasbih
|
Mala or rosary
|
The following Sufi terms were used for their equivalents for the various Hindu stages
of spiritual progress
Talab
|
Yearning for God
|
Ishq
|
Love for this attainment
|
Marfat
|
Enlightenment after realisation
|
Fana
|
Surrender
|
Tauhid
|
Experiencing Allah permeating all
|
Hairat
|
Ecstasy attained at the sight of Divinity
|
Fukr Wa Fana
|
Moksha or Nirvana
|
According to ‘Vedaprakash’ only about 20% of the Indian Sufis were truly secular
and spiritual in their outlook and had true respect for the Hindu religion and spiritualism.
The rest, with the connivance of the Muslim rulers, only swindled the gullible Hindus.
They have been the most fundamentalist, fanatic and extremist in their attitudes,
behaviour and encounter with Hindus. Many Sufis served in the government, received
free lands and donations apart from every assistance that government office could
provide for their roles as ambassadors and spies.
The Chistiyya were the patron saints of Muslim rulers and Shaikh Abdur-Rahman Chisti
advocated that the Chishtiyyas were the sole protectors of the King and Islam. Many
in their order have been glorified for leading the Muhammadan armies and for acting
as spies. The Shattariyya, Shaikh Abdullah marched with his disciples dressed as
soldiers from Central Asia to Bengal to convert Bengali kafirs, that is, the Hindus.
Ahmed Sirhindi (1564-1624) had written many letters to the rulers to wage jihad
against the kafirs. The Sufi Nizamuddin Awaliya actively participated in jihads
against the local people. Shaikh Nasirid-Din-Muhammad (d. 1356) advocating government
service for Sufis and jihad has quoted
“The essence of Sufism is not an external garment
Gird up your loins to serve the Sultan and be a Sufi”
Many famous Hindu temples were taken over and converted into khanaqas and
popular Hindu festivals were transformed into Muslim ones. The Sufis first occupied
places near the temples, and then slowly began entering these temples to ultimately
convert them into their places of worship. And soon, under some pretext the temple
would be partly or fully demolished and the idols destroyed. Muslim rulers of the
time connived with the Sufi saints in the whole process, often using force against
the Hindus.
Frawley categorizes the Sufis into ‘conservative’ and ‘liberal’. We have seen the
conservative category above. The liberal, mostly recent converts from Hinduism were
tolerant and non-political, and although they had only recently cut off their umbilical
cords from Hinduism, they too had been tainted by the stain of intolerance. Thus
although Chistis are considered liberal, they considered themselves to be patron
saints of the intolerant Muslim rulers of India and actively promoted conversions.
The famous Sufi saint, Nizamuddin Auliya had blessed and prayed for victories of
the most ruthless of invaders, Allauddin Khilji. The Naqshabandi and Suhrawardi
orders too were extremely intolerant. They criticised Akbar and helped Aurangzeb
to murder his older brother Dara, a fine scholar, deeply influenced by the Vedantic
thought. Both Ahmad Sirhindi and Shah Waliullah, reputedly two of the most intolerant
among the Sufis, belonged to the Naqshabandi School. In fact the latter conspired
with Ahmad Shah Abdali of Afghanistan to invade India since they were worried about
the rising Maratha power. Muhammad Iqbal, the twentieth century Muslim poet in undivided
India who provided the poetic and philosophic inspiration for the creation of Pakistan,
was a great admirer of both.
Eaton, studied the role of Sufis from the 14th to the 18th
century in the kingdom of Bijapur in the Deccan plateau. He concludes that the stereotyped
conception of medieval Indian Sufis as pious and peace-loving mystics lovingly preaching
Islam among Hindus was grossly inaccurate and declares that the sufis actually
played very active social and political roles. The hagiographic literature studied
by Eaton describes the period when the first group of Sufis entered this region
in the beginning of fourteenth century as being the ‘chalk of dawn’ of Islamic civilization
in the Deccan. In the same literature they are also pictured as militant champions
of Islam waging jihad in a Dar-ul-Harb, slaying countless Hindu infidels against
overwhelming odds and, more often than not, being themselves slain in the process.
The first ‘Warrior’ Sufis to arrive in Bijapur were around 1318 AD when Malik Kafur
raided the South although traditions say that some had penetrated even earlier.
They generally accompanied the invading armies and themselves were often professional
soldiers. There being no established tradition of urban Islamic culture at that
time, this category of Sufis could not relate to any court or ulema. Indeed,
in one sense, they functioned as the ulema. Being the sole representatives
of Islam, accompanying the armies, they declared and thereby legitimized the jihad
against non-Muslims.
Early Islam was defined and sustained by the fear of Hell. Since death as
a result of fighting a jihad was the surest passport to Paradise, it probably came
about that in the early days, the Muslim faithful including their religious leaders,
undertook religious warfare or jihad, particularly on the frontiers as their primary
religious duty. It should be noted that this was a phenomenon noticed on all frontiers
of Islamic territories and the Arabic word ‘ribat’ (equivalent to khanaqah
in Persian), which originally signified forts or fortified lines, came to mean for
the Sufis, hospices for religious life.
Sufis in Bijapur
Once Muslim power was firmly established through the Bahamani kingdom in 1347 AD,
this class gradually disappeared. Now the more established and sophisticated orders
like the Chisti and Shattari made inroads into the plateau. Initially they were
established in the power centers of Gulbarga and Bidar, but after the dissolution
of the Bahamani Empire, they gradually migrated to Bijapur whose power was firmly
established around the middle of the sixteenth century.
The evolution of Sufis in Bijapur has been summarised by Eaton in the following
table which compares the characteristics of the different categories of Sufis and
their pattern of behavior from the Bijapur records, as the fortunes of this kingdom
first waxed and then waned.
Attributes
|
Warrior
Sufis
|
Reformist
Sufis
|
Literati,
Mystical
|
Literati,
Popular
|
Landed
Sufis
|
Dervish
Sufis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
1275-1350
|
1575-1650
|
1500-1700
|
1650-1700
|
1650-1700
|
1650-1725
|
Relation to Court
|
n.r.
|
Integrated
|
Indifferent
|
Indifferent
|
Integrated
|
Hostile
|
Relation to Ulema
|
n.r.
|
Integrated
|
Indifferent
|
Indifferent
|
Integrated
|
Hostile
|
Relation to Islam
|
n.r.
|
Integrated
|
Orthodox
|
Orthodox
|
Integrated
|
Hostile
|
Relation to non-Muslims
|
Hostile
|
Indifferent
|
Accommodating
|
Accommodating
|
Hostile
|
Accommodating
|
Affiliation by Order
|
None
|
Qadiri, Shattari
|
Chisti
|
Chisti
|
Qadiri, Shattari
|
None
|
Affiliation by Class
|
Foreigner
|
Foreigner
|
Deccani
|
Deccani
|
Deccani
|
Deccani
|
Residence
|
n.r.
|
Urban
|
Rural
|
Rural
|
Urban
|
Rural
|
Literary Language
|
|
|
Persian, Dakhni
|
Dakhni
|
|
|
n.r. : Not relevant
The first powerful Sultan, Ali I, was a Shia and hence Sunni Sufis were discouraged
from establishing themselves. But during the reign of the Sunni ruler, Ibrahim II
(1580-1627), reputed to be more liberal by disposition, a great many Sufi orders
came into being. The Sultan, a contemporary of Akbar, attempted to blend the best
of Islam and Hinduism. This drew flak from the Sufis who still retained close ties
with the Arab Mid-East and who sought to redirect the Sultan from what they considered
his aberrant ways. Although these reformist Sufis could not influence him, they
certainly were partly responsible for the nature of his successors, who were rigidly
orthodox and fanatic about their faith. The genuinely mystic among the Sufis confined
themselves to their khanaqas, indifferent to the politics of the court, and composed
mystical literature both in Persian and the local Deccani Muslim dialect. The compositions
were mainly in Deccani and it was around this time that saw the beginning of the
decline of the kingdom. This phase began around 1650 AD and ended in 1686 when Aurangzeb
annexed the kingdom which ultimately resulted in the total eclipse of this state.
By this time the khanaqas were converted into tombs or dargahs of pirs,
the master Sufis, and attracted a great many devotees. In this taifa stage,
in order to win the loyalty of the hereditary pirzadas or descendants of
the pirs, who commanded a significant following, large tracts of land were
donated by the royalty creating the landed Sufi class which lived by the glory of
their ancestors. This category of Sufis became increasingly more intolerant and
there were many Hindu-Muslim riots as a result of this ‘army of prayer’.
As a reaction to these developments, there now arose in large numbers another significant
class, the Dervish Sufis or majzub who were nonconformists, much like the
hippies or the ‘flower children’ of the West in the 1960s. These were addicted to
wine and bhang which lifted them to heights of ecstasy. This amounted to
withdrawal from society and Eaton terms this phenomenon as ‘a return full circle
to the point from which that evolution first sprang’ in Iraq and Khurasan. They
were more tolerant of the Hindu society around them and in fact, adopted many of
its practices.
The above discussions based on standard sources shows that the Sufi movement is
quite complex. Hindu scholars will have to study it in depth in order to assess
its actual impact on our society.