Asoka
The first major foreign invasion was by Alexander in 326 BC. The nature and extent of his
raid on India are sometimes overstated. The adventure was brilliant but he never fought
any of the great armies of Bharat. Neither was there a test between Greek and Indian
military skills nor was his campaign a military success as it did not result in a
permanent occupation of Punjab or leave an impact on the life of the people. What remained
of the Greek occupation was wiped out by Chandragupta Maurya. But Alexanders
invasion promoted the political unification of India, smaller states got merged into
bigger ones, paving the way for Chandragupta. The only permanent result of
Alexanders campaign was that it opened up communication between India and Greece.
This was achieved at the cost of untold suffering inflicted upon India - massacre, rape,
plunder on a scale without a precedent till then but repeated later by Timur, Nadir Shah.
Chandragupta was succeeded by his son Bindusara (300 to 273 BC) followed by Ashoka (273 to
236 BC). A unique features of Ashokas rule that left a permanent record of his
history in inscriptions engraved on natural rocks and pillars which continue to stand
today as proof of Indias architectural / engineering skills.
An able soldier he carried on a policy of conquest and aggression. He conquered Kalinga in
the eight year after his coronation but the severity of the resistance put up and the
resulting horrors are described in Rock Edict XIII. 1,50,000 captured, 1,00,000 slain and
many times more died. Instead of gloating over his conquest, the war brought about a
complete change in Ashoka.
According to Buddhist tradition, Asoka was converted to Buddhism after the Kalinga war. In
Rock Edict XIII, Asoka expresses genuine remorse for the sufferings caused by the war, he
felt remorse on having conquered Kalinga. It is probably the only instance in world
history where a victorious monarch is known to have given such expressions. He made two
resolutions. One was to eschew all war in the future. If anyone does him
wrong the Beloved of the gods must bear all that can be borne. Henceforth his policy
would be one of conciliation towards all. The exhortation of good deeds was the
foundation for his second resolution i.e. the inculcation of his Dharma (Dharma or law of
Piety) not only among the people of his own dominions but all over the world. Asoka has up
conquest through arms and replaced with conquest through Dharma.
Asoka was attracted more by the ethical than the philosophical aspects of Buddhism and
laid stress on the practical benevolent activities and thoughts inculcated by it. Then he
entered and or lived in the Buddhist Sangha or monastery, took up missionary activities,
the task of propagating Dharma, which is of such universal equality as to appeal to
humanity at large. He set up a network of missions within India and abroad. To his credit,
he did not ignore governance, in fact the new outlook made him very compassionate towards
his subjects.
Dharma - Asoka worked for the moral upliftment of people, insisted on
family as the basis of morality, respect to be shown to elders and teachers. Thus the
starting point of religious and moral life was purification of home, family and domestic
life by the cultivation of relations with all concerned. Character, conduct and behavior
counted more than ceremonies to him. Next religion was to extend from family to
communities. The 12th Rock is an appeal for the toleration of all religious sects
but also delivering a spirit of reverence for them. Above all, Asoka stood for
Ahimsa to men and animals, which he preaches in all his edicts. Further he
purified his national policy by proclaiming war as an unmitigated and absolute evil. He
preached tolerance of all sects, schools of thought. Thus Asoka stood out as an apostle of
Peace.
A consequence of this passion for peace was that, unlike his illustrious
grandfathers scheme of establishing authority all over India, Asoka left unsubdued
smaller and weaker people, states of India and established all states big or small on
equal sovereignty.
Asokas great innovation was the substitution of stone with wood and brick. He
decorated the country with structures and artistic monuments. The Royal Palace of
Pataliputra was recognized as the work of superhuman minds. He also improved upon the
irrigation work started by Chandragupta Maurya.
Post Ashoka - The history of his successors is shrouded in mystery. The
reason being the empire was too large to be kept as one by unworthy successors. Asoka had
too many sons, is likely that fought amongst themselves. It is however agreed that
Brihadratha was the last king of the Maurya dynasty i.e. up to 187 BC. The progressive
disintegration that followed Asokas rule is marked by several facts. According to
Rajatarangini, Asokas son Jalauka became an independent ruler in Kashmir and
conquered territory up to Kannauj. Another son Virasena set up at Gandhara. The
disintegration of the Mauryan Empire was speeded up by the Yavana invasions, the final
blow struck by the revolt of Pushyamitra, the commander-in-chief of Brihadratha.
What are the reasons for the downfall of the Mauryan Empire? One view is
that the humiliation of Brahmans led to a backlash and a revolution by a Brahman
Pushyamitra. This logic seems slightly far-fetched. Another reason is the doctrine of
Ahimsa. Since Ashoka eschewed all wars, naturally this reduced the military efficiency of
his empire. However, considering the circumstances of those days, such a large empire was
bound to break. There were other causes too, the spirit of local autonomy, oppressive rule
and rebellious disposition of governors, palace intrigues and official treachery. Foreign
invasion too. The repeated revolt by the province of Taxila, due to the opposition of
local officials is one e.g. It is likely that weaknesses caused by internal dissension
invited foreign aggression.
There is no doubt that the moral ascendancy of Indian culture over parts of the world was
thanks to Ashoka. As a country it has made many proud. It came albeit at a heavy price, a
weak Central authority for which Bharat has had to pay a heavy price during the last two
thousand years. All depends what you cherish. High moral values with massacre, rape, loot
or political stability with protection of Dharma.
Impact - Quote freedom fighter K M Munshi But welfare states, which
eschew armed coercion of recalcitrant elements are not known to survive. As soon as Asoka
died, his Buddhist leanings and pacific policy evoked open resistance. Due to a lack of a
vigorous military policy, the outlying provinces rose in revolt. The Greeks invaded India
and advanced up to Ayodhya and Chitor. Further disintegration was halted when Pushyamitra
(187 to 151 BC), took over what was left of the Empire. Dharma Vijaya was no longer to be
achieved by abjuring war but by building military strength, politics became real. The
Sungas vanished Greek invaders, were respected by foreign kings. They fostered a revival
of art, literature and architecture. In Madhyadea, among the wise and intellectual, the
ascetic look lost its attraction. Dharma was strengthened. The new wave of collective
enthusiasm found its expression in a combative attitude against Buddhism in search of a
fuller and richer life, in the cult of Karttikeya, the god of war, in the resurgence of
the Bhagwata Cult, in the unchallenged supremacy of Vasudeva Krishna in the Hindu
Pantheon.
Three main teachings of Asoka were we must bear all that can be borne, policy of
conciliation towards all and tolerate all religions. These thoughts are divine but
are they practical. For the last two thousand years Indians have borne more misery than
any other nation in the world. Yet we have no respite. The rule today is that a person who
suffers quietly should suffer more e.g. the Pandits of Jammu and Kashmir. Religious
tolerance is amongst the best quality of Indian religions. It has allowed foreigners,
Parsis, Jews to come and get absorbed in our country. Yet, this goodness is being misused
by the Muslims and Christians to indulge in conversions and criticize our religion,
culture in harsh terms.
Has the policy of Conciliation brought peace in the Indian sub-continent? Our ex Prime
Minster followed this policy in the form of Gujral Doctrine. Inspite of unilateral
concessions to our neighbors Pakistan reason for existence is the destruction of India.
Nepal has become a beehive of anti-India activities; a mere rumor is enough to start
anti-India protests. The less said about the Bangladesh the better. We fought for their
freedom, tolerate over 2 crore Bangladeshis in India, yet the recent killing of 16 Border
Security Force soldiers in Meghalaya!
I believe that in every experience there is learning. Asoka left an
unparalleled example of the chaos that would reign in India when there was a weak central
authority. Sardar Patel understood this and insisted on a strong center during his
discussions with the British. But thereafter! Over 2,000 years have past, we continue to
be influenced by Asokas concept of a welfare state.