"A platform to share knowledge and insights to help Indians reconnect
with their heritage and build a glorious future together"

What Hindus Need To Know

Jodha Bai Writes From Her Grave
By R. K. Ohri, February 2008 []

Chapter :

Copyright@ R.K. Ohri                                                                                                                                                   
Please hear me; I am Mariam Zamani @ Jodhaa Bai speaking from my grave in Fatehpur Sikri.    I turned in my grave and have woken up in pain on hearing the falsehood being propagated by the Film Director, Gorwarikar, and many dehumanized T.V. anchors. Surprisingly Gowarikar has projected me as a lovelorn consort of Emperor Akbar. But truth is altogether different.  Akbar had multiple wives and nearly 5000 beautiful women in his harem, as pointed by that acclaimed historian, Vincent Smith. Please listen to my painful story which I am narrating today after being made to turn in my grave by Gowarikar. If you have a heart, you will be able to hear my heart rending sobs, too.

Born as a Hindu princess, I was proud daughter of the Rajput Raja Bharmal of Aamer and my real name is Heera Kanwar. After I was married off to Akbar by my helpless father as the price paid for saving his kingdom, I was converted to Islam and re-named as Mariam Zamani. And was buried here after death in this every graveyard of Fatehpur Sikri, the capital of King Akbar. My helpless father, my coward father, could not save me from the clutches of that very King Akbar who had a roving eye for beautiful girls, anywhere and everywhere. I too was very beautiful and that is what pushed me, a child bride of 13 years, into his harem as Mariam Zamani!  That was how I, a Rajput princess became a helpless pawn in that “political deal” between the powerful and the weak and the oppressor and the oppressed  -  I mean the Mughal King Akbar and my father Raja Bharmal of  the not-so-powerful kingdom of Aamer.  The film director and T.V. anchors are liars. They have concealed these true facts.

That is my true story, the story of an unfortunate child bride, a Rajput princess. There was no love between me and Akbar. It was Akbar’s lust and my beautiful body.

Pure and simple sexploitation and nothing more. No one knows why the Film director Gowarikar and anchors of television channels are trying to befool the gullible Indians by
projecting my ‘forced marriage’ with Akbar, sort of a “ransom contract” between the powerful and the weak, as a great love story. How could a king like Akbar love me and me alone, when he had multiple wives and thousands of captive concubines?

Only some dim-wits can call it a love story!  Please hear me; I am Gowarikar’s Jodhaa Bai @ Mariam Zamani, sobbing here in the graveyard of Fatehpur Sikri where I was dumped after my death.

I am shocked that the so-called ‘Research Team’ of  the clever film Director Gowarikar did not read what Vincent Smith has written about Akbar’s notorious harem overflowing with women and dainty girls. Why did they not read what Akbar’s  chief hack, Abul Fazal, has written in AIN-E AKBARI about the condition of  Akbar’s infamous harem. How is it that in this Year of the Girl Child no television channel, no film director of India, has the guts to speak about the fate of thousands of helpless women, princesses as well as commoners, trapped in the horrid harems of Akbar and several other Mughal kings?  Why this conspiracy of silence?  Why do they want to project lecherous kings like Akbar as Great Emperors by weaving yarns about their non-existent love and lustful lives?  Perhaps it is the jingle of money which has made them insensitive to the misery of thousands of helpless women trapped in Moghul harems!  But why so much love for money? Why should one try to earn money by purveying utter falsehood?  I am indeed in great pain on seeing all this. Come, listen to me and hear my wails.  I am Gowarikar’s Jodhaa Bai, Bharmal’s daughter Heera Kanwar, buried as Mariam Zamani here in Fatehpur Sikri.  

My brave mother protested and cried when I was being sold into slavery of Akbar by my father for protecting his kingship - you might call him a coward which perhaps he was. But he was helpless, too. For days my mother wept and wept and wept. Ultimately she stopped speaking with my father and refused to acknowledge him as her husband. That was indeed my loving mother, my heart-broken Maa.     

I am speaking from the graveyard of Fatehpur Sikri. How is it that no film maker, no film director, no TV channel has the courage to depict truth, speak out  truth and make movies on the plight of those helpless women, thousands of them, kept as sex slaves in the harem of Akbar and harems of many other Mughal  kings, of  their  Viziers and hangers on ?  May I know the reasons for this skullduggery?  I know, no film wallah,    no T.V. anchor, will reply to my inconvenient questions. Yet, I must speak in great pain today from this wind-blown graveyard of Fatehpur Sikri.  Please lend me your ears for a while; please lend me your aching heart for a while. I beseech you.  I am Gowarikar’s Jodhaa Bai.  

In this forlorn graveyard thousands of helpless women victims of Mughal rulers are buried, mostly Hindus. But there are some Muslim girls, too. All of us have the same story of misery, a lifetime spent in loveless harems of lecherous kings. I am sure the unfortunate Muslim women buried here by my side will also sit up and ask on the Day of Judgment what was their fault for which they thrown into the harem of  a  debauche king. 

I am Jodhaa Bai @ Mariam Zamani speaking from my grave in Fatehpur Sikri. I have turned in my grave because of the pain inflicted on me by a film director who has painted me as a lovelorn queen – something which I never was. Please lend me your ears and listen to my monologue!                    

Chapter :

Post A Comment

'The purpose of this feature is to provide a platform for exchange of views.
Please Register with site to post a comment and avoid abuse and getting into personal arguments.

[75] Comment(s) Posted
  1. Comment By - kota shalini chowdhary Date - 17 Feb 2016 Time - 5:00PM
  2. akbhar is not given the responsibility to ruqiya jodha given the responsibity of his son saleem to ruqiya because ruqiya doesnt have any kid as u said akbhar is not in luv with jodha then y the history is saying that they are a great luvrs as u said he is not aluvr and mostly knwn as a king then how u can say that he juzt luvd the ruqiya and one more thing ruqiya is the one who spoiled saleem with bad habbits and she trys to say that no one is luving him and always said that akbhar and jodha is not luving him in his child hood and she juzt used him as a weapon to took the revange against jodha better u shuld knw the history then u can comment

  3. Comment By - paridhi sharma tokas Date - 13 Dec 2015 Time - 11:17PM
  4. Hmmm....Jahangir wife name was jodh Bhai not jodha Bhai...n as far as love may be their love story not in books still circulating in fathepur sikhri..we can hear soo many tales abt them in that region which we can get in books....Mariam uz zamani is hindu acc to badayun.. court historian of Akbar...we have some documents to prove jodha is powerful like her power to issue FARMANSS..SHE ALSO ARRANGED HER SONS MRRG WITH HER NIECE WHICH IS NOT POSSIBLE UNLESS SOME FREQUENCY...BASELESS ARTICLE...NOTHING MORE THAN THAT...MARIAM UZ ZAMANI HAD VERY GRAND LIFE THROUGHOUT HER LIFE...HISTORY PROVES IT

  5. Comment By - Shreemanti CHAKRABARTY Date - 21 Oct 2015 Time - 2:01AM
  6. What’s in a name? That which we call rose by any another name would smell as sweet” said the famous 16th century poet William Shakespeare in Romeo and Juliet.%0d%0a%0d%0a%0d%0a %0d%0aLittle did the great poet or any another learned men knew that a change in name be the reason of communal violence, conflicts, turmoil and even a threat to the ancient history on the other side of the globe. His countryman Col. James Tod followed the quote so ardently that he even did not take care to look into records while writing his book Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan. This British East India employee and an amateur historian went ahead by quoting one of the most disastrous line in history and that is none other than “…On the union of the imperial house with that of Jodhpur, by the marriage of Jodha Bai to Akbar.The historian clearly mentions in page 965 of his book (Volume II) that it was Jodha bai of Jodhpur who married Akbar. Probably being an Englishman he messed up the names of two distinct and totally different Rajput princess of two diverse era – Harkha Bai (Hira Kunwari) of Amer and Jodhaa Bai (Jagat Gosain aka Manavati Baiji Lal later Taj Bibi Bilkhis Makhani). Going by a number of inaccuracies in his work, it is very clear that the amateur historian messed up the two names and mistook Jodha Bai for Hira Kunwari. Princess of Jodhpur (daughter of Udai Sighji Sahib) was not married to Akbar but his son Salim (later Jahangir).%0d%0a%0d%0aHowever, in the same book (1920 edition) you will find the editor William Crooke quoting “Ain-i-Akbari” I (Page 619) explaining that although there has been controversies about Jodha Bai, it is evident that she was wife of Jahangir and not Akbar. This fact again has been supported by the writer himself where he refers Jodha Bai as the daughter of Raja Udai Singh of Jodhpur. Now, the Rajput princess who married Akbar in 1562 in Sambhar, Rajasthan was not the daughter of Raja Udai Singh of Jodhpur but Raja Bharmal of Amer. Jodha Bai was wife of Jahangir and mother of Shah Jahan whereas Hira Kunwari was wife of Akbar and mother of Jahangir. In the footnotes the editor mentions – “Jodha Bai is a title, meaning ‘Jodhpur lady’. There were some doubts about her identity, but she was certainly daughter of Udai Singh and wife of Jahangir .Although the concept of Jodha Bai being Akbar’s wife never emerged until 19th century, readers did fell prey to James Tod’s mistake and failed to recognize the editor’s correction or even referring the documentary history of the Great Akbar’s era in the form of Tabqat-i-Akbari, Mutakhabutawarikh, Akbar Namma and Ain-i-Akbari which no where mentions Jodha Bai as Akbar’s wife.%0d%0aSo, there is no point in reading this above blog since there are number of mistakes.%0d%0aFirstly this blog mentions that Rajkumari Jodhaa Bai was a princess of Amer (currently Jaipur).Secondly, this blog tells the reader that Jodhaa bai was married to Emperor Akbar only at the age 13, while other facts prove that the princess of Amer was married to Akbar at Sambar in 1562 ,almost 20 years after her birth. The fact that the Princess of Amer was not the chief love consort of the Mughal Emperor might be true since there were other chief queens of the Emperor like Begum Ruqaiya Sultan and Salima Sultan. This blog also Conveys a wrong message that the Princess of Amer was forcefully converted to Islam is definitely wrong since books, monuments like Jodhaa Bai`s palace proves the existence of a Hindu Begum ....

  7. Comment By - Karan Pandit Date - 07 Oct 2015 Time - 2:00PM
  8. Such a lame and senseless comment has been made by rubi riya riya below! The way the comment is written proves that the person is brainless, illiterate and fanatic. Not to mention the person completely missed the point of this article or may be purposely has highlighted the crap about Ruqaiya which is insignificant to the article but I guess that is wat I call is the modus operandi of the Muslims and that is too beat around the bush and come to silly irrelevant fake conclusions.

Add Your Comment