Mother Teresa- Giving Charity an Uncharitable Name

Mother  Teresa’s brand of charity favours embracing poverty rather than eradicating it.  Makes you wonder whether they are in it for their own good.

Anthony Malkin has balls. The New Yorker, who  owns the Empire State Building, has turned down a request to change the colours  of the celebrated building’s lights to blue and white on the 100th  birth anniversary of Mother Teresa, the Nobel Peace Prize-winning nun.

Even as hundreds of demonstrators threatened to  close down the city’s 34th Street between Fifth and Sixth avenues, where the  main entrance to the building is located, an unfazed Malkin cited a policy of  not illuminating the edifice for religious figures, for the denial.

The world needs more people like Malkin. For,  right now the media seems to be in a PR tear to spin the Teresa tale without  any sense of balance or enquiry. Indeed, Teresa, with her patina of piety, is  being dumbed down for the consumption of the multiplex hordes.

In India where Teresa did her ‘charity’ work for  more than half a century, the ruling party, eager to tap into the immense  goodwill that exists among the pantheistic Hindus, flagged off a new train  named Mother Express. It is indeed an irony that the country that has got stuck  with the poverty tag, in large part because of the activities of the poverty  hugging Teresa, is going overboard to honour the Macedonia Mother.

The real Teresa was a lot less saintly than she  is portrayed by the fawning media, the gullible public and, of course, those  mostly Christian protestors in New York ready to cross the boundaries of  accepted civic behaviour.

Pocketing  Ill-Gotten Wealth
Remember Charles Keating? An investment fraud  artist, he was the chairman of the Lincoln Savings and Loan Association, which  was the target of a federal investigation after the 1989 S&L collapse,  which wiped out $160 billion in savings. Many of those affected were ordinary  Americans.

Keating, a Roman Catholic, it was discovered,  had given more than a million dollars to Teresa and flew her around in his jet.  During his trial for fraud, Teresa wrote to judge Lance Ito, telling him what a  good guy Keating was and asked for leniency in sentencing. She advised him to  do what Jesus would do. While what Jesus would have done belongs in the  rhetorical realm, judge Ito gave Keating 10 years for fraud.

The scene now gets murkier. Says Dr Don Boys, a  former member of the Indiana House of Representatives and author: “Teresa  received a letter from the Deputy District Attorney telling her that the money  Keating had given her was stolen from hard working people and suggested that  she return the money. I would have suggested, after all, that is what Jesus  would have you do. The good nun never answered his letter (nor returned the  stolen money). After all, it was for the ‘poor’.”

Dodgy Dealers
Dr Boys says that while Teresa wasn’t very  sophisticated in her dealings, she or her handlers were very astute in using  the media for her own end, raising money for her cause of adding members to the  Catholic Church. “Some of the sugar daddies she fawned over were disreputable,  unscrupulous people such as the bloody Haitian dictator Jean-Claude Duvalier  (who plundered Haiti), Communist Albanian dictator Enver Hoxha, Charles  Keating, and other scoundrels,” he says.

One of the characters in her inner circle was  Jim Towey, who became her legal counsel in the late 1980s. In February 2002,  President George W. Bush violated both the letter and the spirit of the  American constitution setting up the Office of Faith-Based and Community  Initiatives to further the cause of fundamentalist churches and religious  conversions. Towey was appointed director of this office.

Teresa was a faithful servant of the Vatican. In  an article in, author Christopher Higgins says, “During the  deliberations over the Second Vatican Council, under the stewardship of Pope  John XXIII, (Teresa) was to the fore in opposing all suggestions of reform…..Her position was ultra-reactionary and  fundamentalist even in orthodox Catholic terms.” In fact, while receiving the  Nobel Peace Prize she told a dumbfounded audience that abortion is “the  greatest destroyer of peace”.

Mother of all  Hypocrisies
One of the most compelling accounts of the  macabre world of Teresa’s order, the Missionaries of Charity, is by the  Australian, Collete Livermore. A nun who worked in Teresa’s order for 11 years,  she ended up sick and disillusioned. In 1984 she quit and wrote the book Hope  Endures, where she talks about a little known but disturbing side of Teresa,  which she says hurt the truly needy.

Livermore explains how the nuns were not  provided with medical advice, the use of mosquito repellents, or information  about malaria and vaccinations because Teresa believed God would look after the  nuns. Livermore got into trouble with the order for helping a man with  dysentery who was in danger of dying. “The order cared more about obedience  than doing the right thing,” she writes. Teresa quoted Peter 2:18-23, which  orders slaves to obey their masters even if they are abusive and difficult, and  used this text to urge her nuns to obey superiors without question.

In Manila, Teresa wouldn't let the nuns have a  washing machine, which forced the nuns to wash the underwear of the incontinent  with brushes. Livermore felt the order was more concerned about inflicting  hardship on the nuns than on helping the sick. More angst was in store for  Livermore when she was forbidden to help a sick boy called Alex. That’s when  she decided to leave the order because she didn't like the way she was expected  to let the poor suffer.

It would, of course, be pertinent to add that  each time Teresa herself fell sick she sought the best medical care. Her stay  in an elite California hospital was the most glaring instance.

Fraudulent Canonization
In 1997, a year after her death, the Pope  nominated Teresa for beatification, the first step towards sainthood. However,  by doing this the Pope violated a Vatican tradition that allowed a cooling off  period of five years to guard against dubious characters.

Writes Higgins: “As for the ‘miracle’ that had  to be attested, what can one say? Surely any respectable Catholic cringes with  shame at the obviousness of the fakery. A Bengali woman named Monica Besra  claims that a beam of light emerged from a picture of (Teresa), which she  happened to have in her home, and relieved her of a cancerous tumour. Her  physician, Dr Ranjan Mustafi, says that she didn't have a cancerous tumor in  the first place and that the tubercular cyst she did have was cured by a course  of prescription medicine. Was he interviewed by the Vatican's investigators?  No.”

Higgins continues: “According to an  uncontradicted report in the Italian paper L'Eco di Bergamo, the Vatican's  secretary of state sent a letter to senior cardinals in June, asking on behalf  of the pope whether they favoured making (Teresa) a saint right away. The  pope's clear intention has been to speed the process up in order to perform the  ceremony in his own lifetime.” Was it his payback for her unquestioning support  for his anti-reformist agenda?

Poverty Pashas
Teresa, clearly, wasn’t a friend of the poor;  she was a friend of poverty. What has she and her charity achieved in the last  six decades in Calcutta? Virtually nothing except give the city, and India by  association, a very bad name.

Today, large swathes of India are entering the  First World thanks to hard word and free enterprise. On the other hand,  Calcutta, virtually alone among India’s cities, seems stuck in LDC mode. While  it’s long marriage with Marxism may have something to with the lack of  progress, the presence of the poverty mongers ensures the city finds it  impossible to shake off its Third World image. Teresa’s fundraising sermons  have drilled into people’s mind that it is a city of lepers and beggars. On one  instance, the nuns claimed, untruthfully of course, that Calcutta had 450,000  lepers, knowing that the rich have a poor conscience and would promptly  despatch their dollars.

The Legacy
The Vatican’s mythmakers will surely send Mother  Teresa climbing up the sainthood charts. She fits squarely in the Catholic  Church’s agenda to claim India and convert its billion Hindus to Christianity.  Today, her charities have attained untouchable status, which helps them fend  off any attempts by the authorities to stop their morbid experiments on sick  and poor people trapped in Teresa’s dystopian world. Charity isn’t what it used  to be.

(About the  author: Rakesh Krishnan Simha is a features writer at Fairfax New Zealand. He  has previously worked with Businessworld, India Today and Hindustan Times, and  was news editor with the Financial Express.)

Receive Site Updates